Sökning: onr:jw025g82gkz976qq > Construction and Ev...
- 1 av 1
- Föregående post
- Nästa post
- Till träfflistan
Construction and Evaluation of an Algorithmic and Distributed Prioritization Method [Elektronisk resurs]
- Loconsole, Annabella (författare)
- International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ), Essen, Germany (2011)
- Gruber, Hannes (författare)
- Nae, Adrian (författare)
- Regnell, Björn (författare)
- Malmö högskola Fakulteten för teknik och samhälle (TS) (utgivare)
- Publicerad: Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems, University of Duisburg‐Essen, 2011
- Engelska.
- Serie: ICB Research Reports, 1860-2770 1860-2770
- Ingår i: 17th International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2011). Proceedings of the REFSQ 2011 Workshops REEW, EPICAL and RePriCo, the REFSQ 2011 Empirical Track (Empirical Live Experiment and Empirical Research Fair), and the REFSQ 2011 Doctoral Symposium. ; 110-121
- E-bok
Sammanfattning
Ämnesord
Inställningar
Hjälp
Stäng
- Prioritization of requirements and tasks is an important activity of the development process; it can however be a very complex and time-consuming activity. In this paper we present MAAD (Method for Agile, Automated and Distributed prioritization) an algorithmic prioritization method. The method was developed at Flygprestanda AB, which needed a systematic and automated way of prioritizing requirements and work tasks. The method is constructed based on existing prioritization methods, focusing on minimizing the end-user time-consumption. Factors considered in the priority calculation are Urgency, Benefit, Cost, and Type. Furthermore, in order for the method to suit different companies and projects the importance of the different factors is adjustable. An evaluation was performed, which showed that MAAD prioritization was easierto- use, less time-consuming, more accurate, more scalable and the prioritization method most suitable for Flygprestanda compared to Wiegers method and the prioritization method used at the company.
Ämnesord
- Engineering and Technology (hsv)
- Teknik och teknologier (hsv)
Genre
- government publication (marcgt)
Indexterm och SAB-rubrik
- prioritization
- factor
- weight
- algorithm
- urgency
- benefit
- cost and type
Uppgift om bibliotek saknas i LIBRIS
Kontakta ditt bibliotek, eller sök utanför LIBRIS. Se högermenyn.
- 1 av 1
- Föregående post
- Nästa post
- Till träfflistan
Sök vidare
Hjälp
- Fler titlar av
- Loconsole, Annabella
- Gruber, Hannes
- Nae, Adrian
- Regnell, Björn
- Malmö högskola Fakul ...
- International Workin ...
- Fler titlar om
- Engineering and Tech ...
- Teknik och teknologi ...
- Fler titlar i denna genre
- government publicati ...
- Serie
- Fler delar
- channel record
- Fler delar
- Ingår i
- 17th International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2011). Proceedings of the REFSQ 2011 Workshops REEW, EPICAL and RePriCo, the REFSQ 2011 Empirical Track (Empirical Live Experiment and Empirical Research Fair), and the REFSQ 2011 Doctoral Symposium
Sök utanför LIBRIS
Hjälp
- Sök vidare i:
- Google Book Search
- Google Scholar
- LibraryThing
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.
Copyright © LIBRIS - Nationella bibliotekssystem
