Startsida
Hjälp
Sök i LIBRIS databas

     

 

Sökning: onr:4ljp565j2vt40sg1 > How a point-of-care...

How a point-of-care dashboard facilitates co-production of health care and health for and with individuals with psychotic disorders [Elektronisk resurs] a mixed-methods case study

Gremyr, Andreas (författare)
Holmberg, Christopher (författare)
Thor, Johan (författare)
Malm, Ulf (författare)
Gäre, Boel Andersson (författare)
Andersson, Ann-Christine (författare)
Malmö universitet Fakulteten för hälsa och samhälle (HS) (utgivare)
Publicerad: BioMed Central (BMC), 2022
Engelska.
Ingår i: BMC Health Services Research. ; 22:1, 1599
Läs hela texten
Läs hela texten
Läs hela texten
  • E-artikel/E-kapitel
Sammanfattning Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • BACKGROUND: Individuals with psychotic disorders experience widespread treatment failures and risk early death. Sweden's largest department specializing in psychotic disorders sought to improve patients' health by developing a point-of-care dashboard to support joint planning and co-production of care. The dashboard was tested for 18 months and included more than 400 patients at two outpatient clinics. METHODS: This study evaluates the dashboard by addressing two questions: 1) Can differences in health-related outcome measures be attributed to the use of the dashboard? 2) How did the case managers experience the accessibility, use, and usefulness of the dashboard for co-producing care with individuals with psychotic disorders? This mixed-method case study used both Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) and data from a focus group interview with case managers. Data collection and analysis were framed by the Clinical Adoption Meta Model (CAMM) phases: i) accessibility, ii) system use, iii) behavior, and iv) clinical outcomes. The PROM used was the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), which assesses functional impairment and disability. Patients at clinics using the dashboard were matched with patients at clinics not using the dashboard. PROM data were compared using non-parametric statistics due to skewness in distribution. The focus group included five case managers who had experience using the dashboard with patients. RESULTS: Compared to patients from clinics that did not use the dashboard, patients from clinics that did use the dashboard improved significantly overall (p = 0.045) and in the domain self-care (p = 0.041). Focus group participants reported that the dashboard supported data feedback-informed care and a proactive stance related to changes in patients' health. The dashboard helped users identify critical changes and enabled joint planning and evaluation. CONCLUSION: Dashboard use was related to better patient health (WHODAS scores) when compared with matched patients from clinics that did not use the dashboard. In addition, case managers had a positive experience using the dashboard. Dashboard use might have lowered the risk for missing critical changes in patients' health while increasing the ability to proactively address needs. Future studies should investigate how to enhance patient co-production through use of supportive technologies. 

Ämnesord

Medical and Health Sciences  (hsv)
Clinical Medicine  (hsv)
Psychiatry  (hsv)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap  (hsv)
Klinisk medicin  (hsv)
Psykiatri  (hsv)

Genre

government publication  (marcgt)

Indexterm och SAB-rubrik

Coproduction
Learning health systems
Psychosis
Schizophrenia
Inställningar Hjälp

Ingår i annan publikation. Gå till titeln BMC Health Services Research

Om LIBRIS
Sekretess
Hjälp
Fel i posten?
Kontakt
Teknik och format
Sök utifrån
Sökrutor
Plug-ins
Bookmarklet
Anpassa
Textstorlek
Kontrast
Vyer
LIBRIS söktjänster
SwePub
Uppsök

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

Copyright © LIBRIS - Nationella bibliotekssystem

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy