Startsida
Hjälp
Sök i LIBRIS databas

     

 

Sökning: onr:jt5mpq15g5mh3k76 > No survival differe...

No survival difference between robotic and open radical hysterectomy for women with early-stage cervical cancer [Elektronisk resurs] results from a nationwide population-based cohort study

Alfonzo, Emilia (författare)
Wallin, Emelie (författare)
Ekdahl, Linnea (författare)
Staf, Christian (författare)
Radestad, Angelique Floter (författare)
Reynisson, Petur (författare)
Stålberg, Karin (författare)
Falconer, Henrik (författare)
Persson, Jan (författare)
Dahm-Kahler, Pernilla (författare)
Uppsala universitet Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet (utgivare)
Publicerad: Elsevier, 2019
Engelska.
Ingår i: European Journal of Cancer. - 0959-8049. ; 116, 169-177
Läs hela texten
Läs hela texten
Läs hela texten
  • E-artikel/E-kapitel
Sammanfattning Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare overall survival (OS) and diseasefree survival (DFS) after open and robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Patients and methods: This was a nationwide population-based cohort study on all women with cervical cancer stage IA1-IB of squamous, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous histological subtypes, from January 2011 to December 2017, for whom radical hysterectomy was performed. The Swedish Quality Register of Gynaecologic Cancer was used for identification. To ensure quality and conformity of data and to disclose patients not yet registered, hospital registries were reviewed and validated. Cox and propensity score regression analysis and univariable and multivariable regression analysis were performed in regard to OS and DFS. Results: There were 864 women (236 open and 628 robotic) included in the study. The 5-year OS was 92% and 94% and DFS was 84% and 88% for the open and robotic cohorts, respectively. The recurrence pattern was similar in both groups. Using propensity score analysis and matched cohorts of 232 women in each surgical group, no significant differences were seen in survival: 5-year OS of 92% in both groups (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-2.01) and DFS of 85% vs 84% in the open and robotic cohort, respectively (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.66-1.78). In univariable and multivariable analysis with OS as the end-point, no significant factors were found, and in regard to DFS, tumour size (p < 0.001) and grade 3 (p = 0.02) were found as independent significant risk factors. Conclusion: In a complete nationwide population-based cohort, where radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer is highly centralised, neither long-term survival nor pattern of recurrence differed significantly between open and robotic surgery. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 

Ämnesord

Medical and Health Sciences  (hsv)
Clinical Medicine  (hsv)
Cancer and Oncology  (hsv)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap  (hsv)
Klinisk medicin  (hsv)
Cancer och onkologi  (hsv)
Medical and Health Sciences  (hsv)
Clinical Medicine  (hsv)
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine  (hsv)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap  (hsv)
Klinisk medicin  (hsv)
Reproduktionsmedicin och gynekologi  (hsv)

Genre

government publication  (marcgt)

Indexterm och SAB-rubrik

Cervical cancer
Radical hysterectomy
Robotic
Surgery
Survival
Disease-free survival
Inställningar Hjälp

Beståndsinformation saknas

Om LIBRIS
Sekretess
Hjälp
Fel i posten?
Kontakt
Teknik och format
Sök utifrån
Sökrutor
Plug-ins
Bookmarklet
Anpassa
Textstorlek
Kontrast
Vyer
LIBRIS söktjänster
SwePub
Uppsök

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

Copyright © LIBRIS - Nationella bibliotekssystem

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy