Startsida
Hjälp
Sök i LIBRIS databas

     

 

Sökning: onr:22682149 > The Cambridge Progn...

The Cambridge Prognostic Groups for improved prediction of disease mortality at diagnosis in primary non-metastatic prostate cancer [Elektronisk resurs] a validation study

Gnanapragasam, V. J. (författare)
Bratt, O. (författare)
Muir, K. (författare)
Lees, L. S. (författare)
Huang, H. H. (författare)
Stattin, Pär (författare)
Lophatananon, A. (författare)
Umeå universitet Medicinska fakulteten (utgivare)
Alternativt namn: Umeå universitet. Medicinsk-odontologiska fakulteten
Alternativt namn: Medicinska fakulteten vid Umeå universitet
BioMed Central 2018
Engelska.
Ingår i: BMC Medicine. - 1741-7015. ; 16
Läs hela texten
Läs hela texten
Läs hela texten
  • E-artikel/E-kapitel
Sammanfattning Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: The purpose of this study is to validate a new five-tiered prognostic classification system to better discriminate cancer-specific mortality in men diagnosed with primary non-metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: We applied a recently described five-strata model, the Cambridge Prognostic Groups (CPGs 1-5), in two international cohorts and tested prognostic performance against the current standard three-strata classification of low-, intermediate- or high-risk disease. Diagnostic clinico-pathological data for men obtained from the Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe) and the Singapore Health Study were used. The main outcome measure was prostate cancer mortality (PCM) stratified by age group and treatment modality. Results: The PCBaSe cohort included 72,337 men, of whom 7162 died of prostate cancer. The CPG model successfully classified men with different risks of PCM with competing risk regression confirming significant intergroup distinction ( p < 0.0001). The CPGs were significantly better at stratified prediction of PCM compared to the current three-tiered system (concordance index (C-index) 0.81 vs. 0.77, p < 0.0001). This superiority was maintained for every age group division ( p < 0.0001). Also in the ethnically different Singapore cohort of 2550 men with 142 prostate cancer deaths, the CPG model outperformed the three strata categories (C-index 0.79 vs. 0.76, p < 0.0001). The model also retained superior prognostic discrimination in the treatment sub-groups: radical prostatectomy ( n =3D 20,586), C-index 0.77 vs. 074; radiotherapy ( n =3D 11,872), C-index 0.73 vs. 0.69; and conservative management ( n =3D 14,950), C-index 0.74 vs. 0.73. The CPG groups that sub-divided the old intermediate-risk (CPG2 vs. CPG3) and high-risk categories (CPG4 vs. CPG5) significantly discriminated PCM outcomes after radical therapy or conservative management ( p < 0.0001). Conclusions: This validation study of nearly 75,000 men confirms that the CPG five-tiered prognostic model has superior discrimination compared to the three-tiered model in predicting prostate cancer death across different age and treatment groups. Crucially, it identifies distinct sub-groups of men within the old intermediate-risk and high-risk criteria who have very different prognostic outcomes. We therefore propose adoption of the CPG model as a simple-to-use but more accurate prognostic stratification tool to help guide management for men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. 

Ämnesord

Medical and Health Sciences  (hsv)
Clinical Medicine  (hsv)
Urology and Nephrology  (hsv)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap  (hsv)
Klinisk medicin  (hsv)
Urologi och njurmedicin  (hsv)
Medical and Health Sciences  (hsv)
Clinical Medicine  (hsv)
Cancer and Oncology  (hsv)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap  (hsv)
Klinisk medicin  (hsv)
Cancer och onkologi  (hsv)

Indexterm och SAB-rubrik

Prostate cancer
Prognostic prediction
Cancer-specific mortality
Cambridge Prognostic Groups
Non-metastatic disease
Stratification
All-cause mortality
Competing risks
Improved treatment section
Treatment selection
Inställningar Hjälp

Beståndsinformation saknas

Om LIBRIS
Sekretess
Blogg
Hjälp
Fel i posten?
Kontakt
Teknik och format
Sök utifrån
Sökrutor
Plug-ins
Bookmarklet
Anpassa
Textstorlek
Kontrast
Vyer
LIBRIS söktjänster
SwePub
Sondera
Uppsök

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

Copyright © LIBRIS - Nationella bibliotekssystem

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy